Latest News

The NEW Form I-9: What are employers liable for?

In continuation of our blog on March 13, 2013 regarding the revised Form I-9 employers must keep, we are providing this follow-up blog to inform our readers about the consequences employers may face with this form. As a reminder, Form I-9 must be completed for every new employee hired by U.S. employers and certain agricultural recruiters and referrers for a fee (all together “Employers”) within the first day of employment. The purpose of this form is to verify the identity and employment authorization eligibility of each employee. In other words, this form is intended to help Employers hire only those authorized to work in the U.S. In filing out this form, Employers should examine employee’s documents such as a U.S. passport/card, a permanent resident card, an employment authorization document, and the like (for a full list of documents please go to http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-9.pdf, specifically page 9). While Employers need not make a copy of these documents, it is suggested that copies be made as evidence Employers hired a lawful worker. Where Employers “knowing hire” (defined as actual and constructive knowledge) or continue to employ an unlawful worker they may be fined (between $110 – $1,110), be subject to cease and desist orders, be criminally prosecuted, and/or be subject to debarment from federal contracts.

Employers are to complete Section 2. Failure to do so is a violation of the regulations (8 C.F.R. 274a.2(b)(3)). Making a copy of the documents provided by the employee does not fulfill this regulation and does not relieve Employers from liability for a substantive paperwork violation.

The retention of this form becomes relevant when U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) audits Employers. There are no triggers to being audited therefore it is imperative to have Form I-9 fully completed for each employee. Violations are classified as either technical or substantive. Technical violations are those which are minor or unintentional, while substantive violations are for major violations. If a technical violation is discovered, Employers are given notice and ten (10) business days to correct the error. If time passes and the correction is not made, Employers will be fined.

Additionally where paperwork penalties are present, they may be litigated or negotiated. Although ICE has broad authority and discretion on assessing penalties, the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (“OCAHO”) is not bound by ICE’s decision. As such, if Employers do not agree with ICE’s decision, they should request a hearing with OCAHO.

It is strongly recommended that Employers be thorough in checking the work authorization of each employee and complete Form I-9 on the employee’s first day of employment as audits are random and have no triggers. If further information is needed on Form I-9

Associate, Elizabeth Oaxaca

USCIS delays implementation Customer Identity Verification at its field offices

In an effort to defend against threats to national security and identity fraud, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) has begun implementation of the Customer Identity Verification (CIV) program in its field offices. This program applies to individuals who appear at USCIS field offices for an interview or to request evidence of an immigration benefit. This means any guests accompanying the individual, including a petitioner, will not go through the CIV. Before proceeding to his/her interview or being issued evidence of an immigration benefit, USCIS staff will take two (2) fingerprints and a photograph of the individual. This information will be run through the U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology’s (“US-VISIT”) Secondary Inspections Tool (“SIT”), which will re-verify the individual’s biometrics. It should be noted that US-VISIT is linked to several databases including borders inspections and security. Once cleared, the individual will proceed to his/her interview or being issued evidence of the immigration benefit.

The program was to begin on May 6, 2013 but has been delayed due to technical difficulties.

Texas HB 3206 would allow driver permits for illegal immigrants

The Texas House is working on letting immigrants here illegally get specialized driving permits.

Rep. Roberto Alonzo, D-Dallas, who authored the measure, is working with 2 Republicans to craft a compromise version of a bill that would give immigrants here illegally the ability to drive legally in Texas and obtain insurance – but only after they submit to a criminal background check, fingerprinting and prove state residency.

The new form of driving permit will not be an actual driver’s license.

The 2011 law, which required proof of lawful status to obtain a drivers license in Texas, has left immigrants who drove legally for decades unable to renew their licenses or buy insurance.

Major business groups across the state, including the Texas Association of Business and the Greater Houston Partnership, are supporting the bill, as are local law enforcement, including Harris County Sheriff Adrian Garcia.

“This bill is a good idea. It would make the streets of Harris County safer for everyone,” Garcia said. “We would learn a lot more than we know now about drivers who are already traveling our roadways every day, but have been unable or afraid to obtain a driver’s permit and insurance. Having more legal, insured drivers helps all drivers.

“We would have the fingerprints of this group of drivers,” Garcia continued. “We would have the results of their background checks. We would be sure they pass the driver’s test and can understand our roadway signs in English.
“We would know that a limited permit could not be used as sufficient ID to vote or have other rights and privileges that belong only to U.S. citizens.”

“Whatever their legal status is in the country, this doesn’t change that,” said co-author Rep. Jose Menendez, D-San Antonio. “It doesn’t make them legal. It just says they can buy insurance.”

The bill could hit the House floor by next week.

Alonzo stated he has secured votes from 55 Democrats and three Republicans so far, leaving him 18 shy of being able to send the bill to the Senate.

Some Republicans remain staunchly opposed to it. Rep. John Smithee, R-Amarillo, said that, although supporters have made some convincing arguments, he still sees the proposal as “primarily an immigration situation.”

“The resident permit … is not intended to provide the user access to a federal building, including an airport,” Sen. Tommy Williams said.

The measure is being cast by hard-line immigration groups as a “travesty of justice,” saying it would, essentially, neuter the state’s ID law.

Why every day that passes without a solution is not good for Comprehensive Immigration Reform? We have a solution!

By Partner Rehan Alimohammad

The Senate Bill was comprehensive and monstrous to say the least about the 844 page bill. The House comprehensive bill has not been introduced yet and unfortunately every day that goes by is another nail in the coffin for CIR. President Obama is now saying he is “open” to a tougher bill from the House, but not addressing the approximately 12 million illegals is a non-starter. Every day that passes allows the rift in the House on this issue to get deeper. With an immigration bill needing to either go through the Immigration Subcommittee, where piecemeal bills have already been introduced, or go directly for a vote, which would likely cost Speaker Boehner his job, CIR is at a crossroads.
Senator Rubio recently stated correctly that the Senate proposal would not pass the House. It seems the major point of disagreement will be what to do about the illegal immigrants in the U.S. What is seen by some as fixing a problem is seen by others as rewarding law-breakers.

So what’s the solution? For President Obama to call a meeting of key leaders from the House and Senate? That could probably push them further away, making some feel that the President is meddling in the Congressional process. How about a meeting between key leaders of the Senate and House, including House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte and Immigration Subcomittee Chairman Trey Gowdy? I think this could work, with one addition: a discussion of changing the physical presence requirement and a hearing on the possible infusion of tax revenue from applicants under a law that would allow illegal immigrants to become legal and possibly legal permanent residents. Right now, the Senate Bill proposes to allow those who have been here since December 31, 2011 to apply, assuming they meet the other requirements. That was a surprise since even deferred action required at least 5 years of presence. Pushing back the date to say 2008 would greatly reduce the number that would qualify, while still solving the bulk of the problem. The people who arrived after that could get some other status but maybe not legal permanent residence. And, maybe an increase in the number of years from 3 years to file for citizenship to 7 or 10 years?

Many of my colleagues have stated that people should start preparing 2-3 years of tax returns because they are confusing the 3 year deadline of claiming a tax refund with how far back a person can go to file a return. As a CPA as well, we have filed returns as far back as 2000 for those who have not filed. The Senate Bill states that all tax liability should be resolved. For those who have been here for many years, the revenue from previous income along with interest and penalties, could be a boon for the economy. A hearing on the potential of this windfall could boost the chances of sufficient support for the bill.

As an immigration attorney, I obviously want to help as many people as possible, and proposing changes where the number permanently helped would decrease goes against my heart, but for the sake of fixing the system before it is too late, maybe it is best. Remember, campaigning for the 2014 election is just around the corner. If the past tells us anything, it is that when an election comes up, immigration reform definitely will not happen too close to one, and then promises will be made to fix it right after one. And we have heard this promise too often.

Rehan Alimohammad, and Attorney and CPA, is the Partner in charge of Immigration and Tax Matters at Alimohammad & Zafar, PLLC and has written over 200 articles on immigration topics in community papers. He has also given over 100 seminars on immigration topics and has a bi-weekly radio show on 1460 A.M. in Houston, Texas discussing the latest in immigration developments and answering immigration questions. He received his undergraduate degree at the University of Texas in Austin, and his law degree in 2001 from the University of Houston. You can contact him at rehan@aandzlegal.com or 281-340-2074.

Breakdown of the Senate Comprehensive Immigration Bill

by Partner Rehan Alimohammad

Bill S.744, also known as the “Border Security, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Modernization Act allows for individuals in unlawful status to apply to adjust their status to the legal status of Registered Provisional Immigrant Status. This status could not be given until 2 border strategies are submitted, and the deadline for these strategies to be submitted would be 180 days after the bill’s enactment.

RPI Eligibilty
1. Residence in the United States prior to December 31, 2011 and maintenance of continuous physical presence since then.
2. Paid a $500 penalty fee (except for DREAM Act eligible students), assessed taxes, application fees.
3. Not eligible if:
A. Convicted of an aggravated felony;
B. Convicted of a felony;
C. Convicted of 3 or more misdemeanors;
D. Inadmissible due to security, criminal, public health and other grounds
E. Unlawfully Voted;

Spouses and children can qualify as RPI dependents if the spouses or child is physically present in the US on the day the principle’s RPI status is granted and also present on 12/31/2012. They have to also meet the rest of the RPI requirements except the RPI’s physical presence requirement.

Benefits of RPI
1. Will get work authorization and permission to travel in and out of U.S.
2. Includes people outside U.S. who were here before December 31, 2011, who were deported for non-criminal reasons, if they are spouse or parent of U.S. citizen or permanent resident
3. Individuals with removal orders will be permitted to apply as will aliens currently in removal proceedings.
4. Spouses and children of people in RPI status can be petitioned for as derivatives of the principal applicant (but must be in the United States at the time).
5. Individuals with removal orders will be permitted to apply as will aliens currently in removal proceedings.
6. RPI status shall last for a 6-year term that is renewable if the immigrant does not commit any acts that would render the alien deportable. Another $500 penalty fee is due at this time (payable in installments).

RPI to Green Card
No one who has Registered Provisional Immigrant Status (RPI) could receive a green card except for Dreamers or Agriculture card holders until Border Strategies have been implemented and substantially completed (requires 90% effectiveness), an employment verification system has been implemented, and there is an electronic exit system at air and sea ports

RPI’s eligible for permanent resident status (green card) after 10 years in RPI status or longer depending on border requirements but they must qualify for a green card just like anyone else under merit/points system and they:

a) maintained continuous physical presence in U.S. (no absences totaling 180 days in one year)
b) paid all taxes;
c) worked regularly in U.S. or attended school full time;
d) demonstrate knowledge of civics and English;
e) all people currently waiting for green cards have finished their process;
f) pay $1000 fee;

3 years after receiving a green card, the applicant can apply for citizenship.

Dream Act
Those who qualify for Dream Act can apply for Green Card after 5 years at lower fees and can apply for citizenship directly after if:
1. They have been RPI for 5 years,
2. Were younger than 16 when entered U.S.
3. Earned a High School Diploma/GED in U.S.
4. Attended college/university for at least 2 years or has served in Armed Forces for at least 4 years
5. Can pass English/Civics exam

New Green Card Categories
1. Family immigration programs limited from four to two categories: 1)unmarried sons/daughters over 21 of US Citizens, and 2)married sons/daughters under 31 of US Citizens and unmarried sons/daughters of LPR’s
2. Eliminates the Family Fourth category (siblings of U.S. citizens) 18 months after enactment
3. Immediate Relative definition amended to include child or spouse of permanent residents.
4. Repeal the Diversity Visa program (green card lottery).
5. EB1 categories exempt from annual green card limits (extraordinary ability, outstanding professors/researchers, multinational executives/managers).
6. Family members, PhD’s, and physicians who obtained J-1 waivers are exempt from employment-based annual limits.
7. Business start-up green card created

Merit Based/Points System
The merit based visa, created in the fifth year after enactment, awards points to individuals based on their education, employment, length of residence in the US and other considerations. Those individuals with the most points earn the visas. 120,000 visas will be available per year based on merit. The number would increase by 5% per year if demand exceeds supply in any year where unemployment is under 8.5%. There will be a maximum cap of 250,000 visas.

Under one component of this merit based system the Secretary will allocate merit-based immigrant visas beginning on October 1, 2014 for employment-based visas that have been pending for three years, family-based petitions that were filed prior to enactment and have been pending for five years, long-term alien workers and other merit based immigrant workers. RPI’s get green cards under this system

1. Education: PHD = 15 pts, Masters = 10 pts, Bachelors = 5 pts
2. Work Experience: Up to 20 points depending on years and type of job
3. Entrepreneur: Up to 10 points
4. High Demand Employee: Up to 10 points
5. From a country of low admissions into the U.S = 5 pts
6. Civic involvement = 2 pts
7. Know English = 10 pts
8. Family relationships = Up to 10 pts

H-1B Visa
1. Raise base cap from 65,000 to 110,000
2. Based on demand for H-1Bs and unemployment rate, cap could go as high as 180,000
3. 30-day recruitment period required
4. Prevailing wage requirements and higher wages for H-1B dependent employers
5. Spouses of H-1Bs get work authorization if their home country has reciprocal treatment of U.S. workers’ spouses
6. Filing fee increased to $5000 for employers who have between 30% and 50% H-1B or L-1 employees ($10,000 if more than 50%)
7. Employers prohibited from having more than 75% H-1B/L-1 employees in 2014 and 50% by 2016.

W Visa for Low Skilled Workers
The visa would affect housekeepers, landscapers, retail workers, and some construction workers. The number of visas would be between 20,000 and 200,000 per year during times of high employment. One third of the visas would be reserved for businesses that employ further than 25 people, and no more than 15,000 visas per year would go to construction workers.
1. Employers must be registered and pay fee.
2. Employees must be registered.
3. New Commissioner will designate shortage positions and regions.
4. Spouses will also receive work authorization.
5. Lasts in three-year increments.
6. Employer must recruit for position for 30 days and pay prevailing wage

Asylum
Currently an applicant seeking political asylum must file for asylum within one year of arriving in the U.S. This one-year limitation will be lifted and an applicant may apply for political asylum even if he or she has resided in the U.S. for more than one year.

About The Author
Rehan Alimohammad, and Attorney and CPA, is the Partner in charge of Immigration and Tax Matters at Alimohammad & Zafar, PLLC and has written over 200 articles on immigration topics in community papers. He has also given over 100 seminars on immigration topics and has a bi-weekly radio show on 1460 A.M. in Houston, Texas discussing the latest in immigration developments and answering immigration questions. He received his undergraduate degree at the University of Texas in Austin, and his law degree in 2001 from the University of Houston.